Comments on OP1.002 version 05-03-009 Boultbee Foreword Typo, third sentence: OP.002 should be OP1.002. I suggest “a” before Visibility Tolerancing System…. Third paragraph, put MIL-C-48497A before MIL-F-48616, since the first edition of MIL-C-48497 predated MIL-F-48616. 1.1 Scope Delete footnotes 1 and 2. We understand these points. Footnote 3: discuss. 2.1: Discuss change to Dave’s dby gordonb - OP1.002-2009+ forum
On August 3rd I posted my inputs from the beginning through Footnote 29. Following are the balance of my comments, as of 8/13/2012. Footnote 30: I think you have attempted to answer the question yourself in 3.2 Fractures At The Surface, and 5.2, Fractures In The Bulk Material. What you need to consider in your wordsmithing is that an edge is also a surface. So do you need to clarify what youby gordonb - OP1.002-2009+ forum
The following comments are through paragraph 4.2.3 and footnote 29 only, and I am still thnking about my input on 3.1.4.1.3. Hopefully I can complete my review of the rest of the document very shortly. Foreword We should only have one foreword, the foreword to the Third Edition. It should summarize in two brief paragraphs what the forewords to the first and second editions said. Second paby gordonb - OP1.002-2009+ forum
We should only have one foreword (not forward); the foreword to the Third Edition. It should summarize in two brief paragraphs what the forewords to the first and second editions said, then discuss the objectives and goals of the third edition. 3.1.1.2: In the Dimensional Tolerancing Scheme, the magnitude does not refer to a scratch’s “maximum dimension,” it refers to its maximum width. A scratby gordonb - OP1.002-2009+ forum
Allen, your rationale for this revision as explained in the Discussion Guide and Design Guide is articulate and compelling. Good job! I have given you offline input on the typos, etc. in the Design Guide. Next I will share a few thoughts and suggestions on the Design Guide before moving to the standard itself. Page 3, second paragraph from the bottom: I don't think the concern originates from aby gordonb - OP1.002-2009+ forum